Submit to governing authorities
Paul opens this unit by stating the basic principle of submission to authorities and the consequence of resisting what God has arranged.
Roman Empire
Emperor Nero (54-68 AD)
Rome was the dominant imperial power when Romans was written.
Thesis
Paul opens this unit by stating the basic principle of submission to authorities and the consequence of resisting what God has arranged.
Plain Meaning
Unit 1 (v. 1): A universal instruction to submit
Paul addresses “every soul,” meaning every person in the community, and calls for a posture of being under “higher authorities.” The instruction is broad and focuses on the stance of subjection rather than listing specific cases.
Unit 2 (v. 1): The stated reason—authority’s source and arrangement
He explains the command by claiming that no authority exists except from God, and that existing authorities are set in place by God. The logic is: because authority is permitted and ordered by God, the proper response is submission.
Unit 3 (v. 2): The inference—resistance equals opposition to God’s arrangement
Paul draws a “therefore”: resisting “the authority” amounts to standing against God’s “ordinance” (his arranged order). The action is framed as more than political defiance; it is treated as defiance of what God has established.
Unit 4 (v. 2): The warning—judgment as the outcome
He concludes that those who take this resisting stance will “receive…judgment” upon themselves. The text does not specify the agent or form of the judgment here, only that it is a self-incurred consequence tied to resisting authority.
Verse by Verse Meaning
A universal instruction to submit Paul addresses “every soul,” meaning every person in the community, and calls for a posture of being under “higher authorities.” The instruction is broad and focuses on the stance of subjection rather than listing specific cases.
The stated reason—authority’s source and arrangement He explains the command by claiming that no authority exists except from God, and that existing authorities are set in place by God. The logic is: because authority is permitted and ordered by God, the proper response is submission.
The inference—resistance equals opposition to God’s arrangement Paul draws a “therefore”: resisting “the authority” amounts to standing against God’s “ordinance” (his arranged order). The action is framed as more than political defiance; it is treated as defiance of what God has established.
The warning—judgment as the outcome He concludes that those who take this resisting stance will “receive…judgment” upon themselves. The text does not specify the agent or form of the judgment here, only that it is a self-incurred consequence tied to resisting authority.
Lexicon
Context
Literary Context
Romans 13 continues the letter’s shift into concrete guidance for daily life that follows Paul’s earlier teaching and his call to present oneself to God in a renewed way (see Romans 12:1–2). The surrounding material emphasizes non-retaliation and peaceable conduct toward outsiders (see Romans 12:17–18), which fits naturally with instructions about how believers relate to public authority. These two verses introduce a larger block (13:1–7) by stating the basic principle (submit) and the core rationale (authority’s place in God’s ordering), then warning about the consequence of resistance.
Historical Context
Paul writes to house churches in Rome during the early Roman Empire, when public order was maintained through layered civil and imperial offices. The audience likely included both Jews and non-Jews living under the same civic expectations, taxes, and legal pressures. In the mid-first century, the emperor’s administration prized stability, and communities could face scrutiny if viewed as disruptive. At this stage, the Jesus movement was not yet consistently treated as a separate, illegal group across the empire, but believers still had to navigate how their allegiance to God shaped their behavior within ordinary civic life and power structures.
Theological Significance
Shared ground
Paul makes a broad claim: “every person” in the community is to live under “higher authorities” (authority). The reason he gives is theological: authority does not exist independently; it exists “from God,” and the authorities that exist are “appointed by God.” From that, Paul draws a moral conclusion: resisting “the authority” is resisting God’s arranged order, and it brings “judgment” on the person resisting.
These verses also sit inside a wider call to peaceable public conduct (Romans 12 leading into 13). The passage’s main point is not to map a political theory but to frame civic posture in light of God’s ordering of the world.
Where interpretation differs
1) What counts as “higher authorities.” Some read this as mainly civil government (local and imperial offices in Rome). Others think Paul’s wording is intentionally broad enough to include any recognized public authority structure.
2) What “appointed by God” means. Some take it to mean governing authorities have real legitimacy because God stands behind the institution of authority. Others take it to mean God permits authorities to exist within his providence without thereby endorsing every ruler’s actions.
3) What “judgment” refers to. Some read “judgment” as mainly civil consequences (penalties imposed by the state). Others read it as divine judgment, or as including both divine and civil consequences.
4) How absolute “be subject” is. Some read Paul as stating a near-unqualified rule: resistance is wrong because it resists God’s order. Others read the instruction as a strong general principle that still has limits when other obligations to God directly conflict (limits inferred from the wider biblical storyline rather than stated here).
Why the disagreement exists The wording is sweeping (“every person,” “no authority except from God”), yet Paul does not list exceptions or edge cases. Key terms are also general: “authority” and “judgment” are not specified (which authority? which kind of judgment?). Because Paul’s rationale is explicitly theological (God’s ordering), readers differ on whether that rationale grants moral approval to particular governments, or only asserts that the existence of authority is part of how God orders society.
What this passage clearly contributes Explicitly, the text connects civic submission to God’s ordering: resisting authority is framed as opposing God’s arrangement, and it carries “judgment.” The passage supplies a theological basis for public order and for treating “authority” as more than a merely human reality. It does not, in these two verses, explain what to do when authorities act unjustly, nor does it define the scope of “judgment”; those are questions raised by the text rather than answered in it.
Support This Project
We're building free, high-quality tools to help anyone study the Bible deeply in its original context. Partner with us.
Explore Related Content
Related Links
Bible & Context
Join our newsletter for updates on new features and what's going on with the project.
- Context-first reading insights
- Bible & Context Updates
- Daily Devotional (Coming Soon)
Need help instead? Contact us.