Second objection and slavery illustration
Paul repeats the objection in a new form and answers by using a servant metaphor, moving from principle to practical direction.
Roman Empire
Emperor Nero (54-68 AD)
Rome was the dominant imperial power when Romans was written.
Thesis
Paul repeats the objection in a new form and answers by using a servant metaphor, moving from principle to practical direction.
Plain Meaning
Unit 1 (v. 15): A second “So what?” question, firmly denied
Paul poses a practical conclusion someone might draw: if people are “not under law but under grace,” maybe ongoing wrongdoing is acceptable. He answers with a blunt refusal, signaling that his earlier point was never meant to excuse continued disobedience.
Unit 2 (v. 16): The core principle—self-offering produces real servitude
He appeals to something they already know: when you “present yourselves” to something as a slave for obedience, you become the slave of whatever you obey. He draws a stark either/or: serving wrongdoing moves toward “death,” while serving obedience moves toward a life aligned with what is right.
Unit 3 (vv. 17–18): Thanksgiving for a changed allegiance and a new kind of service
Paul thanks God that they used to be slaves of wrongdoing but have become obedient “from the heart” to a particular pattern of teaching. He describes this as a transfer of belonging: freed from wrongdoing’s mastery, they have become slaves of righteousness—that is, bound to what is right.
Unit 4 (v. 19): “Human terms,” a bodily call, and a directional goal
He admits the illustration is “human terms,” used because of their “weakness” in embodied life. He recalls their former practice: offering their body parts (“members”) to impurity and escalating wrongdoing. Then he gives the matching command for the present: offer those same capacities to what is right, with the stated aim of growing into holiness.
Verse by Verse Meaning
A second “So what?” question, firmly denied Paul poses a practical conclusion someone might draw: if people are “not under law but under grace,” maybe ongoing wrongdoing is acceptable. He answers with a blunt refusal, signaling that his earlier point was never meant to excuse continued disobedience.
The core principle—self-offering produces real servitude He appeals to something they already know: when you “present yourselves” to something as a slave for obedience, you become the slave of whatever you obey. He draws a stark either/or: serving wrongdoing moves toward “death,” while serving obedience moves toward a life aligned with what is right.
Thanksgiving for a changed allegiance and a new kind of service Paul thanks God that they used to be slaves of wrongdoing but have become obedient “from the heart” to a particular pattern of teaching. He describes this as a transfer of belonging: freed from wrongdoing’s mastery, they have become slaves of righteousness—that is, bound to what is right.
“Human terms,” a bodily call, and a directional goal He admits the illustration is “human terms,” used because of their “weakness” in embodied life. He recalls their former practice: offering their body parts (“members”) to impurity and escalating wrongdoing. Then he gives the matching command for the present: offer those same capacities to what is right, with the stated aim of growing into holiness.
Lexicon
Context
Literary Context
This paragraph continues Paul’s argument that a changed relationship to wrongdoing must show up in changed practice (see the wider discussion in Romans 6:1–14). After answering the first objection (“Should we continue…?”), he now answers a second, slightly different one: “Can we still do wrong because we’re not under law?” He develops the point with a slavery illustration, treating obedience as a kind of self-offering that creates a lived allegiance. The passage also sets up his later, fuller explanation of outcomes and “wages” in the next unit.
Historical Context
Paul writes to house churches in Rome made up of both Jewish and non-Jewish believers, where questions about how Torah-related practices relate to a new way of life were live issues. In the Roman world, slavery was a common and visible social reality, so “slave/master” language would feel concrete, not abstract. Moral teaching also often used the idea of being “ruled” by habits or powers, making Paul’s illustration familiar in form even if his content differs. He writes during Nero’s early reign, when travel and letter networks connected Mediterranean communities.
Theological Significance
Shared ground
Paul’s main point is clear: “not under law but under grace” does not mean wrongdoing is now acceptable (v.15). He answers the objection with an everyday principle: repeated obedience creates real bondage. People become “slaves” to what they obey (v.16). In this passage Paul sets up two paths with different ends—sin leads toward “death,” while obedience leads toward righteousness (v.16).
Paul also treats the Roman believers’ story as a change of allegiance. They “used to” be enslaved to sin, but now they have become obedient “from the heart” to a “form of teaching” (vv.17–18). The slavery picture is acknowledged as a human analogy, chosen because of “weakness of the flesh,” and it is connected to embodied behavior (“members,” v.19).
Where interpretation differs
Some disagreement shows up around what Paul means by “not under law.” One reading says Paul is mainly denying that law-keeping is the governing framework for belonging to God; grace is. Another reading says he is also implying a changed relation to the law as a controlling power over life, so that obedience now has a different basis and motivation. Both readings can still affirm Paul’s explicit point here: grace is not a permission slip for sin.
“Death” (v.16) is another point of difference. Some take it primarily as ultimate, final ruin before God. Others hear it more broadly: death begins now in sin’s destructive outcomes and culminates in final death. The text itself draws the moral direction (“sin → death”) without spelling out every layer.
Why the disagreement exists
Paul uses compressed phrases (“under law,” “death,” “form of teaching”) while arguing quickly. He also mixes categories that can be separated in discussion: (1) a person’s relationship to God’s saving grace, (2) a person’s daily moral practice, and (3) the powers that shape human behavior. Readers tend to emphasize one of those layers more than the others.
What this passage clearly contributes
This paragraph contributes a strong moral logic to Paul’s grace-centered message: grace changes mastery, not just status. The repeated “present/yield” language (present/yield) frames obedience as self-offering that results in real belonging (vv.16, 19). Paul’s thanksgiving (vv.17–18) links inner change (“from the heart”) with receiving a recognizable pattern of instruction (“form of teaching”). Finally, Paul’s “human terms” note (v.19) shows he knows the slavery analogy is limited, but he still uses it to stress how embodied habits can move a person either deeper into impurity or toward holiness.
Support This Project
We're building free, high-quality tools to help anyone study the Bible deeply in its original context. Partner with us.
Explore Related Content
Related Links
Topics
Bible & Context
Join our newsletter for updates on new features and what's going on with the project.
- Context-first reading insights
- Bible & Context Updates
- Daily Devotional (Coming Soon)
Need help instead? Contact us.