Preparing Context
Loading the book, timeline, map, and study notes.
Book
World Stage
Structure
Historical Setting
Opening Book
Loading the overview, historical setting, map, timeline, and chapter structure.
Book
World Stage
Structure
Historical Setting
Opening Chapter
Loading the chapter, structure, timeline, and Scripture reader.
Book
World Stage
Structure
Historical Setting
Opening Passage
Loading the passage, surrounding structure, questions, and study notes.
Book
World Stage
Structure
Historical Setting
1 Chronicles 3:5-9
The record shifts to children born in Jerusalem, expands the list across several verses, and then sums up the whole set.
Meaning in context
The record shifts to children born in Jerusalem, expands the list across several verses, and then sums up the whole set.
Section 2 of 6
David’s Jerusalem children completed
The record shifts to children born in Jerusalem, expands the list across several verses, and then sums up the whole set.
Movement
Remembering David after exile
Artifact
Genealogies and temple preparation
Biblical Timeline
Exile & Return
1 Chronicles context: 586 BC - 400 BC
Biblical Timeline
Exile & Return
1 Chronicles context
Exile & Return / 586 BC - 400 BC
1 Chronicles context is set in the exile and return, where Babylonian exile, return, rebuilding, and renewed covenant life under Persian rule.
Scripture Text
Thesis
The record shifts to children born in Jerusalem, expands the list across several verses, and then sums up the whole set.
Verse by Verse
Four sons from Bath-shua David’s Jerusalem-born sons begin with four names: Shimea, Shobab, Nathan, and Solomon. The text ties these four specifically to Bath-shua and further identifies her as the daughter of Ammiel, helping locate her within a known family.
Additional sons and the total count More sons are listed in grouped lines: Ibhar, Elishama, and Eliphelet; then Nogah, Nepheg, and Japhia; then Elishama, Eliada, and Eliphelet. The passage ends with “nine,” indicating the total number of Jerusalem-born sons just listed. Some names appear twice (Elishama and Eliphelet), which may reflect two individuals with the same name or another kind of listing issue.
Clarifications about other children and Tamar The writer summarizes that all the named individuals are David’s sons, but not the whole set of his sons, because there were also sons from concubines. Tamar is mentioned separately as their sister, marking at least one daughter within this immediate family frame.
Literary Context
This passage sits within a larger genealogical record that traces key family lines for Israel, with special attention to royal descent. In chapter 3 the focus narrows to David’s household and then to the royal line that follows him. The immediate context moves from David’s children born earlier in Hebron (vv. 1–4) to those born in Jerusalem (vv. 5–9), creating a geographic and narrative progression that matches David’s rise to a stable capital. The list-like style prioritizes names, counts, and family connections over story details.
Historical Context
The children named here are associated with David’s reign after he established his rule in Jerusalem, when his household and court expanded in the capital. The book’s final form comes from a much later period, when Judah lived under Persian rule and community identity depended heavily on remembered ancestry and recognized family lines. Listing David’s Jerusalem children helps anchor later generations to the central royal household and to Jerusalem as the political center. It also reflects ancient royal practice where multiple wives and concubines could increase offspring and complicate household records.
Theological Significance
This short paragraph is a family record: it completes the list of David’s sons born in Jerusalem by naming them and giving a total. It highlights four sons tied specifically to Bath-shua and identifies her by her father’s name (Ammiel), treating her as an important link in the record.
Questions
Keep Studying
The text also shows that genealogies can be selective and layered. Even after listing nine Jerusalem-born sons, it adds that David had other sons through concubines, and it mentions Tamar as their sister. So the writer is not trying to give a complete “all children everywhere” list in one sweep; it is finishing one segment of a larger household record.
Two issues are read differently.
First, the repeated names (Elishama and Eliphelet) can be taken as two different sons who happened to share the same name, or as a copying/listing problem that duplicated a name.
Second, the word “nine” can be read as “nine entries in the list as presented” or “nine distinct sons,” depending on what someone thinks is happening with the repeated names.
The passage is a compact list, not a narrative explanation. It gives no extra notes like “the younger” or “another,” so the reader has to infer why two names occur twice. Also, other biblical lists of David’s children do not match every spelling or detail exactly, which raises the possibility of textual variation or alternate name-forms. These features create room for different, reasonable reconstructions while the main point of the list remains clear.
Explicitly, it anchors David’s royal household in Jerusalem and preserves the names and relationships that mattered for later royal descent records. It also makes clear that (1) four Jerusalem sons are linked to Bath-shua, (2) the Jerusalem list is counted as nine, (3) the list is not exhaustive because of sons by concubines, and (4) Tamar is remembered as a sister within this family frame. Those points support Chronicles’ broader interest in tracing David’s line and organizing Israel’s remembered ancestry (1 Chronicles 3:1).
elishama (we·’ĕ·lî·šā·mā‘)