This paragraph mixes a standard reign summary with a sharp moral evaluation. It presents Rehoboam as a real historical ruler with a defined capital (Jerusalem) and duration of rule, and it frames Jerusalem as uniquely significant because it is the place Yahweh chose “to put his name” (v. 21). That claim about Jerusalem sets up why Judah’s religious direction matters so much in the story.

The text then states plainly that “Judah did…evil” and that their sins “provoked [Yahweh] to jealousy” and exceeded what “their fathers had done” (v. 22). The narrator supports that evaluation with concrete examples: widespread high places, pillars, and Asherim (v. 23), and the presence of “sodomites” plus behavior described as like the “abominations” of the peoples displaced earlier (v. 24).

Where interpretation differs

Who is responsible (“they”): Some read “they” mainly as Judah’s leaders (especially the king and court) because royal summaries often focus on leadership. Others read it as the people broadly, since the practices are described as spread throughout the land (“on every high hill…under every green tree”). A third view treats it as shared responsibility: leaders permit or model, and the population participates.

What “jealousy” means when used of Yahweh: Many take it as covenant language: Judah’s worship of other deities is treated like marital unfaithfulness, so “jealousy” signals Yahweh’s exclusive claim on his people. Others emphasize the relational point without pressing the emotion in a human way, reading it as a way of describing Yahweh’s opposition to disloyal worship.

What the “high places” represent: Some interpret all “high places” here as illegitimate worship sites tied to other gods, because pillars/Asherim are named alongside them. Others note that “high places” can sometimes be associated with Yahweh-worship in other texts, so the problem may be their function here (paired with forbidden objects and apparently normalized across the land), not merely their elevation.

What “sodomites” refers to: Some understand it broadly as a description of sexual behavior viewed as immoral. Others see it more specifically as a reference to a social role connected to shrine prostitution or ritual sex in the context of corrupt worship, since it appears alongside cult objects and “abominations.”

Why the disagreement exists

The passage is brief and uses compressed labels (“they,” “jealousy,” “high places,” “sodomites,” “abominations”) without unpacking details. Because the narrator stacks several items together, interpreters weigh context differently: some prioritize the royal-summary frame, others the “every hill/tree” language, and others the association with specific cult objects.

What this passage clearly contributes

Explicitly, it connects Judah’s decline during Rehoboam’s reign to widespread, visible religious practices that the narrator judges as evil (vv. 22–23), and it links Judah’s life in the land to the earlier story of replacing nations whose practices were rejected (v. 24). It also anchors the evaluation to Jerusalem’s special status (v. 21): the problem is not only generic wrongdoing but wrongdoing in a kingdom centered on the city Yahweh chose. As theological inference (not stated as a formula), the text implies that unfaithful worship and social practices are not “private” matters; they shape the nation’s identity and standing in the narrative of Kings.

which (’ă·šer)