Question 1

What three statements does the verse make about Mephibosheth, and how are they connected?

Accepted Answer

The verse makes three direct statements: (1) Mephibosheth lived in Jerusalem, (2) he ate continually at the king’s table, and (3) he was lame in both feet. The second statement is presented as the reason for the first—he is in Jerusalem because his life is now linked to the king’s ongoing hospitality and support. The third statement is not given as a reason, but as a final descriptive reminder. Together, the three lines summarize a stable new status (residing in the royal city and sharing the king’s provision) while keeping his continuing vulnerability in the foreground.

Question 2

How does the word “continually” shape the meaning of Mephibosheth eating at the king’s table?

Accepted Answer

“Continually” pushes the reader away from imagining a single ceremonial meal or an occasional invitation. The verse portrays a repeated, reliable pattern: the king’s table is a regular source of food and status for Mephibosheth. Because the text ties his Jerusalem residence to this ongoing table access (“for he ate continually”), “continually” also signals permanence. The arrangement is established and continuing at the close of the chapter. Even if the exact schedule is not spelled out, the point is sustained support and ongoing recognition within David’s household.

Question 3

What does living in Jerusalem communicate in the story’s setting, beyond a change of address?

Accepted Answer

In this narrative context, Jerusalem is the king’s city and the center of court life. Saying Mephibosheth lived there signals security and visibility: a surviving member of Saul’s house is not hiding on the margins but residing under the king’s protection, close to royal oversight. It also implies a settled outcome rather than a temporary audience with David. The chapter began with uncertainty about how Saul’s remaining family might be treated; it ends with Mephibosheth established in the capital with a defined place in the king’s household.

Question 4

Why might the narrator repeat that Mephibosheth was lame in both feet at the end of the episode?

Accepted Answer

The repetition keeps the reader from concluding that Mephibosheth’s new honor means his vulnerability no longer matters. The story closes by stressing that he remains physically limited even while being publicly included at the king’s table. This preserves a tension central to the episode: David’s protection and provision are ongoing, and Mephibosheth’s need for protection and provision is also ongoing. The repeated detail can also function as a narrative anchor—reminding the reader of the earlier explanation for his condition and keeping his identity consistent in the final snapshot.

Question 5

How does this final verse function as a conclusion to the chapter’s earlier promises and actions?

Accepted Answer

Earlier in the chapter, David promises kindness to Saul’s remaining family for Jonathan’s sake, restores land, and orders ongoing support while granting Mephibosheth a permanent place at the royal table. The final verse reads like a confirmation that these arrangements took hold in daily life. Instead of more dialogue or new events, it summarizes the continuing reality: Mephibosheth is now a resident of Jerusalem and a regular participant in the king’s table provision. The closing reminder about his lameness also confirms that the story is about sustained care, not a change in his condition.

Question 6

What does the verse imply about Mephibosheth’s status—honored guest, dependent recipient, or something else?

Accepted Answer

The verse implies both honor and dependence, without forcing the reader to choose only one. Eating at the king’s table is a strong sign of public inclusion and elevated standing in the court’s social world. At the same time, the explanation (“for he ate continually”) frames that table as ongoing provision—support that enables his settled life in Jerusalem. The final note that he is lame in both feet underscores continuing need and vulnerability. The portrait is not of full independence, but of stable security and recognized place sustained by the king’s hospitality.

Closing snapshot of life in Jerusalem

Closing snapshot of life in Jerusalem

Closing snapshot of life in Jerusalem

Scripture

What this passage is saying

Closing snapshot of life in Jerusalem

Scripture

What this passage is saying