Shared ground
These verses function as Ezekiel’s closing confirmation that the beings in the temple vision are the same beings he saw earlier “by the river Chebar.” The text explicitly says he recognized them as cherubim (v.20). That link matters: the vision is not presented as a new or unrelated spectacle, but as a continued encounter with the same heavenly attendants “under the God of Israel.”
The passage also reinforces continuity by repeating recognizable markers: each creature has four faces and four wings, and something “like” human hands appears under their wings (v.21). The repeated “likeness” language signals visionary description—Ezekiel reports what it resembled.
Finally, v.22 insists on sameness in two ways: the faces match what he saw at Chebar, and “their appearances and themselves” are the same. Their motion is also consistent: each one moves straight forward.
Where interpretation differs
Some readers take “I knew” (v.20) as Ezekiel reaching a clear identification in the moment—certainty rather than confusion. Others read it as describing recognition that becomes clearer as the vision unfolds, especially because earlier descriptions focused on “living creatures” without naming them.
There is also a difference in how people picture the scene “under the God of Israel.” Some hear a simple spatial note (the creatures were beneath the divine throne/platform). Others think it is also a way of stressing rank and delegated service: these are attendants positioned under God’s authority.
A smaller difference concerns how concrete to imagine “hands of a man” (v.21). Some treat it as a fairly literal feature within the vision’s imagery; others emphasize “likeness” and take it as a symbolic way to communicate ability to act or handle tasks.
Why the disagreement exists
The passage is short and uses recognition language (“I knew”), spatial language (“under”), and comparison language (“likeness”) that can be heard in more than one way. It also assumes familiarity with earlier vision material (especially Ezekiel 1), so readers weigh how much new clarity Ezekiel is giving here versus how much he is simply summarizing.
What this passage clearly contributes
Explicitly, the text identifies the “living creatures” as cherubim and ties the temple vision to the Chebar vision in Babylon. By doing that, it supports a major theme in Ezekiel: the God of Israel and his glory are not limited to one location (compare Ezekiel 1:1 and the temple-departure scene in Ezekiel 10). The repeated features and “straight forward” movement also contribute to the portrayal of ordered, directed heavenly movement rather than chaotic motion. Theologically inferred (not stated), this continuity strengthens the claim that Ezekiel’s message is anchored in a consistent, recognizable revelation rather than a series of disconnected visions.