Shared ground
This scene presents the New Jerusalem as a place where God’s presence is immediate and defining. John reports no temple building because “the Lord God, the Almighty, and the Lamb” are themselves what the temple was meant to be (v. 22). That is an explicit claim of the text.
It is also a city defined by light from God, not by created light sources. The city does not need the sun or moon because God’s glory illuminates it, and the Lamb is described as the city’s lamp (v. 23). The nations then “walk” by that light, and earthly rulers bring their “glory” into the city (vv. 24, 26). The gates remain open because there is no night (v. 25), yet entry is not indiscriminate: nothing defiling enters—only those written in the Lamb’s book of life (v. 27).
Where interpretation differs
How literal “no temple” is. Some take v. 22 as a straightforward description of the final city: there is simply no temple structure, because God’s presence is not mediated through a building. Others think John is mainly making a symbolic point: the old temple system has reached its goal, so “temple” language is being used to say “direct access to God,” without requiring a detailed architectural claim.
Who the “kings of the earth” are in this scene. Some read vv. 24, 26 as showing real, renewed human leadership among the nations bringing their best into God’s city. Others read it more as a poetic reversal: what once rivaled God (human glory, imperial honor) is now redirected toward God, without focusing on whether these “kings” are specific ongoing political rulers.
What “glory and honor of the nations” refers to. Some think it points to cultural riches—what is genuinely good in human societies—being brought into God’s city. Others think it refers more narrowly to tribute-like honor: public recognition and submission, the kind of “glory” once claimed by empires, now offered to God.
Why the disagreement exists
Revelation’s images often do double work: they can describe a future reality while also critiquing present-world systems (especially public worship and honor given to rulers). Here, the language of “temple,” “light,” “nations,” and “kings” can be taken either as concrete features of the final city or as vision-language emphasizing God’s unmatched presence and worth.
What this passage clearly contributes
This passage explicitly ties worship and illumination directly to God and the Lamb: God’s glory is the city’s light, and the Lamb is its lamp (v. 23). It also holds together two themes that might seem opposed: welcome (nations and kings come in; gates never shut) and purity/fitness (nothing defiling enters; entry is tied to the Lamb’s book of life) (vv. 25–27). Together, the text portrays God’s final city as secure and open, radiant and ordered, centered on God’s presence rather than on a sacred building. Revelation 21:22–27