Shared ground
These verses portray a universal collapse of human confidence. Every social rank—top to bottom—reacts the same way: hiding in caves and rocky places (explicit). The list is not mainly about profiling each group; it is a sweep meant to say “no one is exempt.”
The fear is directed toward two linked figures: “the one seated on the throne” and “the Lamb” (explicit). The people interpret the upheaval as the arrival of “the great day of…wrath” and conclude that standing exposed before this authority is impossible (explicit, with the final question left hanging).
The passage presents “wrath” as real and personal, not just a vague disaster. It is connected to the throne-sitter and also to the Lamb (explicit). The request for the mountains to fall on them underlines how unbearable they expect this exposure to be (explicit).
Where interpretation differs
1) What “from the face” means. Some read “face” as a direct, visible appearance that people cannot endure. Others read it more broadly as unavoidable exposure—being fully seen, with no hiding place, as judgment arrives. Both fit the language of wanting concealment “from the face” and the wider scene of panic.
2) How literal the mountain request is. Some take “Fall on us” as describing actual physical collapse in the end-time upheaval. Others treat it as vivid speech: people would rather die than face the coming judgment. Either way, the point is desperation, not a careful plan for survival.
3) The timing and scope of “the great day.” Some understand this “day” as the final judgment event. Others see it as a major decisive moment that can include nearer historical judgments while still pointing forward to the end. The text itself marks it as decisive (“has come”) but does not specify a calendar.
4) How the Lamb’s wrath relates to the throne-sitter’s wrath. Some hear a single unified divine action: the throne-sitter and the Lamb act together, so the “wrath” is one reality described from two angles. Others emphasize the striking phrasing “wrath of the Lamb” as highlighting the Lamb’s active role in judgment alongside the enthroned ruler.
Why the disagreement exists
The passage uses compressed, poetic-apocalyptic language: “face,” the personified landscape, and “day” can be read either concretely or as intensifying imagery. Also, the pairing of throne-sitter and Lamb invites readers to decide how tightly to merge their action in this scene.
What this passage clearly contributes
It insists that status, power, and wealth do not provide shelter when ultimate authority is revealed (explicit). It also connects the Lamb—who elsewhere is associated with suffering and sacrifice—to the execution of judgment (explicit). Finally, the closing question (“who is able to stand?”) functions as narrative suspense that prepares for the next section’s answer (inference anchored to the stated setup in the wider flow of Rev 6–7).