Shared ground
These verses present Josiah’s reform as a response to written authority. The king commands a Passover “as written” in the discovered covenant book, and the narrator treats that book as a binding standard for national worship (explicit in vv. 21, 24).
The Passover is also used as a marker of national faithfulness. The narrator claims this particular celebration was unmatched since the era of the judges and across the monarchy (vv. 22–23). Whether that claim is read as strict comparison or strong emphasis, its purpose is clear: it highlights the seriousness and scale of Josiah’s obedience.
The “purge” list (mediums, “wizards,” teraphim, idols, “abominations”) shows the reform is not only about temple rituals but also about everyday religious life in Judah and Jerusalem (v. 24). The final evaluation makes Josiah’s defining trait his total turning to Yahweh measured “according to all the law of Moses” (v. 25).
Where interpretation differs
Some readers take the statement “no such Passover had been kept” as a literal historical claim that nothing comparable occurred in any earlier period (v. 22). Others read it as a deliberate, sweeping way of saying, “This was the most complete and faithful Passover in living memory,” without denying that earlier Passovers happened.
A smaller question is what it means that Josiah acted “that he might confirm the words of the law” (v. 24). Some take “confirm” to mean he enforced the law in practice; others hear the sense of validating the book’s authority by aligning national life with it.
Why the disagreement exists
The passage uses absolute-sounding language (“not… from the days of the judges,” “none before… none after,” “all the people”), which can function either as strict reporting or as rhetorical heightening. Also, the term translated “confirm” can be read as “carry out” or “establish,” leaving room for different shades of meaning.
What this passage clearly contributes
- Reform is portrayed as book-shaped: Josiah’s actions are grounded in what is written, not merely in royal preference (vv. 21, 24).
- Public worship (Passover) and private/local practices (household objects and specialists) are treated as connected parts of covenant faithfulness (vv. 21–24).
- The narrator’s evaluation standard for kingship is covenant loyalty—“heart, soul, might”—measured against the “law of Moses” (v. 25). Deuteronomy 6:5 is echoed in the language of total devotion.