Shared ground
The passage presents a political and tribal turning point: Abner, previously the main power behind Saul’s house, now actively works to move Israel’s leadership toward David. The text’s explicit claims are that Abner speaks to Israel’s elders, presses them to act, appeals to something Yahweh “has spoken” about David delivering Israel, then secures Benjamin’s attention as well (vv.17–19). He brings this proposal to David at Hebron, David hosts him with a feast, and Abner promises to gather “all Israel” so they can make a covenant with David (vv.20–21).
A second shared element is the picture of how leadership change happens in this story: not only through battles, but through elders’ decisions, tribal buy-in (especially Benjamin), public hospitality, and covenant-making.
Where interpretation differs
Two questions draw different readings.
First, what does “Yahweh has spoken of David” mean here (v.18)? Some readers take it as a direct appeal to a known divine promise (possibly via prophetic word or the well-known trajectory of David’s rise). Others think Abner may be using religious language to strengthen a political case, without the text requiring that Abner personally received a fresh revelation.
Second, how should Abner’s claim “in times past you sought for David to be king” be taken (v.17)? Some read it as reporting genuine, long-standing popular preference that was held back mainly by Abner’s influence. Others see it as selective memory or strategic exaggeration meant to build momentum.
Why the disagreement exists
The narrator reports Abner’s speech but does not pause to confirm how accurate or sincere each claim is. The language (“Yahweh has spoken,” “in times past,” “all that seemed good”) can be read either as straightforward reporting of consensus and promise, or as Abner’s persuasive framing while he manages a risky transfer of power.
What this passage clearly contributes
It shows that David’s kingship over a united Israel is portrayed as aligning with Yahweh’s stated purpose of deliverance (v.18), while also emerging through recognizable human processes: coalition-building, tribal politics, and negotiated agreements (vv.17–21). The scene also underlines Benjamin’s importance in national unity and depicts covenant and shared meal as visible signals of alliance and safe conduct. One explicit narrative result is that Abner leaves David “in peace,” indicating a successful, non-hostile meeting at this stage (v.21).