Shared ground
Daniel’s vision briefly widens. Two additional figures appear, one on each riverbank, while the linen-clothed man remains the main speaker, positioned “above” the river (12:5–6). The scene is staged like a formal inquiry: one figure asks a direct “how long?” question about “the end of these wonders,” and the answer comes as a solemn oath (12:6–7).
The oath is emphasized by gesture (both hands raised) and by the one invoked (“the one who lives forever”). The response gives a defined period (“a time, times, and a half”) and links the endpoint of “all these things” to a grim condition: the shattering of the holy people’s strength (12:7). That linkage is explicit in the text; the meaning and scope of the phrases require interpretation.
Where interpretation differs (only where needed)
Some read “a time, times, and a half” as a specific, countable duration (often treated as three and a half “units,” sometimes equated with years). Others treat it as a symbolic way of saying the oppression has a set limit—real and definite, but not meant to be converted into a precise calendar.
There is also disagreement over what event “breaking in pieces the power of the holy people” points to. Some connect it mainly to a severe historical crushing of the community within Daniel’s horizon of persecution. Others see it as a later, final crisis still ahead, with the phrase describing the point at which the faithful are brought to the end of their resources.
Why the disagreement exists
The passage uses compressed apocalyptic language: “wonders,” “a time, times, and a half,” and “breaking in pieces” are not self-defining here. The larger vision (Daniel 10–12) gives context, but it still leaves room about whether the time phrase is intended as a literal measurement or a stylized way of expressing a limited period.
What this passage clearly contributes
It presents a heaven-authorized limit on the duration of the “wonders”: the suffering and upheaval are not described as endless. The timing is delivered under oath, highlighting certainty rather than satisfying curiosity. The text also places the community’s experience—its strength being shattered—at the center of the timetable: the endpoint is tied to what happens to “the holy people,” not merely to shifting empires or leaders. For a later echo of the same time phrase in apocalyptic speech, compare Revelation 12:14.