Shared ground
Exodus 36:35–38 describes two carefully made fabric hangings that control movement inside the tabernacle: an inner veil and an entrance screen. The text stresses skilled workmanship and costly materials—colored yarns, fine linen, gold fittings, and metal bases. It also distinguishes the two hangings by design and hardware: the veil includes cherubim imagery and hangs on four gold-covered acacia pillars set in silver bases, while the entrance screen is embroidered and hangs on five gold-covered pillars set in bronze bases.
These details present the tabernacle as a deliberately ordered space with graded access: there is an outer entry into the tent, and a more restricted inner boundary. Explicitly, the passage is about construction; any further meaning about holiness, approach to God, or priestly access is inference drawn from the tabernacle’s broader function in Exodus.
Where interpretation differs
Two questions often receive different answers.
First, the repeated “he made” can be read as referring to a single named leader from the larger tabernacle narrative, or as a summary way of speaking about the craftsmen as a group under direction. The passage itself does not name the individual here.
Second, readers differ on how much significance to assign to the change in metals (silver bases for the veil; bronze bases for the entrance). Some see these as practical or aesthetic building choices consistent with earlier instructions; others think the change signals a conceptual “progression” of holiness from outside to inside. The text reports the difference but does not explain it.
Why the disagreement exists
The passage gives precise physical details but minimal explanation. It uses brief, repetitive building formulas (“made,” “overlaid,” “cast”) and leaves motivations unstated. Because Exodus elsewhere emphasizes ordered access and holiness in the tabernacle, interpreters sometimes connect these construction details to that larger theme; others limit conclusions to what is directly said here.
What this passage clearly contributes
It shows that the tabernacle’s internal layout required both an entry hanging and an inner veil, each intentionally designed. It highlights craft specialization (skilled workman vs. embroiderer) and the investment of communal resources. It also reinforces continuity with the earlier design instructions (compare Exodus 26:31–37): what was commanded is now being executed with specific materials, supports, and bases.