Shared ground
Genesis 32:22–23 shows Jacob acting decisively in a tense moment. He gets up during the night, gathers his closest household members (wives, female servants, and eleven sons), and uses a known crossing point at the Jabbok. The verbs stress deliberate action: he moves people first and then transfers “what he had” (his property and the rest of his portable wealth).
The text also sets up the next scene by creating isolation. After everyone and everything has been moved to the far side, Jacob is effectively left on the original side by himself, which prepares for what happens in Genesis 32:24.
Where interpretation differs (only where needed)
Two questions are left open by the wording.
First, why he moves at night. Some read the night move as tactical caution—reducing risk before meeting Esau. Others read it more as urgency or inner turmoil. The passage itself does not spell out a motive.
Second, whether Jacob “passed over” and stayed across, or crossed and then went back to send others over (so that he ends up alone on the near side). Both readings try to account for the flow into the next verse, where Jacob is alone.
Why the disagreement exists
The passage uses brief, action-focused narration with repeated “sent over” language, but it does not narrate Jacob’s final position explicitly in these two verses. The next verse’s focus on Jacob alone pushes readers to infer a detail (where he ended up) that is not directly stated here.
What this passage clearly contributes
Explicitly, it portrays Jacob as the head of a complex household, managing a risky crossing in stages: first people, then possessions. By inference—supported by the narrative setup—it creates a scene where Jacob is separated from family and goods, so the story can concentrate on Jacob himself in the dark at a boundary place (a ford). That isolation is a key narrative hinge between Jacob’s planning and the coming encounter.