Shared ground
Elihu describes a real human pattern: heavy oppression produces loud cries for relief (v.9). The suffering is not denied or minimized; it is presented as widespread and crushing.
He then claims something is often missing from those cries: instead of turning toward God, people mainly appeal for rescue from “the arm of the mighty” (v.9–10). Elihu’s language “Where is God my Maker?” frames the problem as God being left out, not merely unknown.
Elihu also adds who God is: the Maker who can give “songs in the night” (v.10) and the Teacher who has given humans greater capacity than animals and birds (v.11). These are explicit descriptions of God meant to support Elihu’s critique.
Where interpretation differs (only where needed)
One difference is how absolute “none says” should be taken (v.10). Some read it as a generalization (“almost nobody asks this”), while others take it as a sharper rhetorical claim (“in practice, nobody asks this”). Either way, Elihu’s point is about the typical direction of the cries.
A second difference is what “songs in the night” implies (v.10). Some understand it mainly as inner comfort and the ability to praise in darkness; others think it leans toward God’s power to bring deliverance that turns night into celebration. The wording itself allows both, since “songs” can express either comfort or rescued joy.
A third difference is who “they” refers to (v.9–10). Some hear Elihu speaking generally about oppressed people, while others think he is indirectly aiming at Job (or at least including him) as an example of crying out without the “God my Maker” posture.
Why the disagreement exists
Elihu’s speech is poetic and compressed. He uses broad statements (“none says…”) and images (“songs in the night”) that invite more than one reasonable nuance. Also, the immediate context is a debate with Job, yet Elihu uses language that fits a wider human pattern.
What this passage clearly contributes
This text distinguishes between crying out because life is crushing and seeking God as Maker and Teacher (v.9–11). It portrays God as present and active even in “night,” not only as a distant judge of wrongs. And it grounds Elihu’s expectation of God-ward speech in creation: humans are taught and made wise by God beyond animals, so mere pain-speech is not the only possible response (v.11).