Question 1

In v.39, what two outcomes does Jesus pair together, and how are they opposites?

Accepted Answer

Jesus describes two reversals. First, “those who don’t see” end up seeing; second, “those who see” become blind. The opposites are not mainly physical eyesight (though the story has that), but the contrast between lacking insight and gaining it versus claiming insight and being exposed as lacking it. The wording makes the outcomes depend on Jesus’ coming—his presence forces a sorting. The verse presents “judgment” not as an abstract idea but as a concrete result: people end up in different conditions depending on how their “seeing” is defined and proved.

Question 2

How does v.40 function in the conversation, and what does it show about the Pharisees’ understanding of Jesus’ words?

Accepted Answer

Verse 40 is a direct challenge that personalizes Jesus’ statement. Some Pharisees who are present ask, “Are we also blind?” That question shows they hear Jesus’ language of blindness as potentially aimed at them, not only as a general proverb. It also shows they recognize “blind” is being used evaluatively, not neutrally. The question invites Jesus to apply the categories to them explicitly. In the narrative flow of John 9, it also highlights that the conflict is ongoing: the leaders remain close enough to hear, and they feel addressed by the verdict Jesus draws from the whole episode.

Question 3

In v.41, what is the structure of Jesus’ response (the “if… but now… therefore” logic)?

Accepted Answer

Jesus answers with a conditional and a conclusion. First: “If you were blind, you would have no sin.” Then he contrasts it: “but now you say, ‘We see.’” Finally he draws the result: “Therefore your sin remains.” The logic depends on their own claim. Jesus treats “We see” as self-testimony that removes an excuse and increases accountability. The passage does not explain every detail of “no sin,” but it clearly links responsibility to the leaders’ stance: their confidence in their own sight becomes part of why their wrongdoing continues rather than being cleared away.

Question 4

Based on vv.39–41, what does “blindness” seem to mean in this closing verdict—literal, metaphorical, or both?

Accepted Answer

In this closing verdict, “blindness” operates on two levels at once. The chapter’s story involves literal blindness and healing, so the word naturally echoes physical sight. But Jesus’ statements in vv.39–41 focus on who truly “sees” in the sense of recognizing what God is doing in Jesus. The Pharisees are not physically blind, yet they ask if they are “blind,” showing they understand a metaphorical meaning. So the passage uses the concrete event (a man gaining sight) as a lens for spiritual perception: the real issue is understanding and response, not eyesight alone.

Question 5

What does the passage explicitly say causes the Pharisees’ sin to “remain,” and what does it not explicitly say?

Accepted Answer

Explicitly, Jesus ties the “remaining” of their sin to their present claim: “now you say, ‘We see.’ Therefore your sin remains.” The immediate cause in the text is not a lack of information but their asserted certainty. The passage does not explicitly spell out every reason they say this, nor does it lay out a full theory of guilt for ignorance versus knowledge. It also does not explicitly state the duration of “remains” beyond the present verdict; readers may infer permanence or an ongoing condition, but the text itself focuses on the link between their claim and continued guilt.

Question 6

How do these verses summarize the larger narrative movement of John 9?

Accepted Answer

John 9 narrates a man moving from physical blindness to sight, and from limited understanding to clearer confession about Jesus. At the same time, the interrogators move in the opposite direction: despite evidence, they become more resistant. Verses 39–41 state that pattern as a principle: Jesus’ coming results in a reversal where acknowledged lack can become sight, while claimed sight can be exposed as blindness. The Pharisees’ presence and question connect the principle to the conflict that has driven the chapter. The final line (“your sin remains”) functions as the closing verdict on that resistance.

John 9:39-41

Read the passage