Application of the wording to believers
He explains the Scripture phrase was recorded for others, connecting the counting language to belief in the God who raised Jesus.
Roman Empire
Emperor Nero (54-68 AD)
Rome was the dominant imperial power when Romans was written.
Thesis
He explains the Scripture phrase was recorded for others, connecting the counting language to belief in the God who raised Jesus.
Plain Meaning
Unit 1 (v. 23): Not only about Abraham
Paul says the wording “it was credited to him” was not recorded only for Abraham’s benefit. The text has a wider purpose beyond the original character in the story.
Unit 2 (v. 24): For later readers who trust the God who raised Jesus
Paul extends the statement to “our sake also,” explaining that it “will be credited” to a group defined by believing in the God who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead. The focus is not simply on Abraham, but on a present/future application to people who share a similar kind of trust.
Unit 3 (v. 25): Two events tied to two outcomes
Paul describes Jesus as the one “delivered up” in relation to “our trespasses,” and also as the one “raised” in relation to our justification. The two clauses are paired: handing over is connected with the problem (trespasses), and raising is connected with the resolving outcome (justification).
Verse by Verse Meaning
Not only about Abraham Paul says the wording “it was credited to him” was not recorded only for Abraham’s benefit. The text has a wider purpose beyond the original character in the story.
For later readers who trust the God who raised Jesus Paul extends the statement to “our sake also,” explaining that it “will be credited” to a group defined by believing in the God who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead. The focus is not simply on Abraham, but on a present/future application to people who share a similar kind of trust.
Two events tied to two outcomes Paul describes Jesus as the one “delivered up” in relation to “our trespasses,” and also as the one “raised” in relation to our justification. The two clauses are paired: handing over is connected with the problem (trespasses), and raising is connected with the resolving outcome (justification).
Lexicon
Context
Literary Context
These verses conclude Paul’s Abraham-focused argument in Romans 4. Earlier, Paul cites the statement that Abraham’s trust was “credited” to him, using it to explain how God counts people as acceptable apart from certain boundary-marking works (Romans 4:1–22). Here Paul turns from Abraham’s case to the audience’s case: what was written then has a forward-looking purpose. He also restates, in compressed form, the basic storyline he has been building toward: God’s action in raising Jesus is the focal point of the trust he is describing (Romans 3:21–26).
Historical Context
Romans was written in the mid-to-late 50s AD, likely from Corinth, to house churches in Rome made up of both Jewish and non-Jewish believers. These communities lived under Roman imperial authority and social hierarchies where status, ethnicity, and public reputation mattered. Within the churches, questions about how Scripture applies to mixed groups and how Abraham’s family identity should be understood remained practical pressures. Paul writes before Nero’s later violent actions against Christians, yet within a climate where minority associations could be scrutinized and where unity across backgrounds required careful framing.
Theological Significance
Shared ground
Paul closes his Abraham argument by saying the line “it was credited to him” was written with a wider audience in view (vv. 23–24). The point is not only what happened to Abraham, but what Scripture says about how God deals with people who trust him.
The group in view is described as “us who believe” in the God who raised Jesus from the dead (v. 24). In this passage, faith is specifically oriented toward God’s life-giving power shown in Jesus’ resurrection (having raised).
Paul then summarizes Jesus’ work with two linked events (v. 25): Jesus was “delivered up” in relation to “our trespasses,” and he was “raised” in relation to “our justification” (justification). The wording ties Jesus’ death to the problem of human wrongdoing and ties his resurrection to the outcome Paul calls justification.
Where interpretation differs (only where needed)
1) What “credited” means here. Everyone agrees Paul is talking about God “crediting” something to believers as he did to Abraham. Some read this mainly as God counting believers as acceptable/right with him. Others emphasize that God is recognizing faith as the key marker of belonging to Abraham’s family, not works that separate groups.
2) Whether “will be credited” highlights timing or certainty. Some take the future wording to stress what happens at a later moment (for example, at a final judgment). Others think it mainly underlines certainty: God credits righteousness to all who believe, and the future tense fits Paul’s way of describing God’s reliable action.
3) The force of “delivered up…raised for.” Many read “for” as purpose/result: Jesus’ being handed over deals with trespasses, and his resurrection brings about justification. Others read the second clause (“raised for our justification”) as confirmation or public demonstration that justification has been secured.
Why the disagreement exists
The verbs are compressed and the key links are expressed with brief “in relation to/for” phrases (v. 25). Those phrases can naturally be heard as purpose (“so that”), result (“with the result that”), or confirmation (“showing that”). Similarly, “credited” can be heard as “counted as true/right” or “assigned/recorded,” and Paul’s broader argument about Abraham and belonging (Romans 4) shapes which nuance interpreters foreground.
What this passage clearly contributes
- The Abraham text was written with later believers in view, not only Abraham (vv. 23–24).
- The “crediting” Paul is discussing applies to those characterized by believing in God, specifically the God who raised Jesus (v. 24). This keeps faith centered on God’s action, not human achievement.
- Paul binds Jesus’ death and resurrection to human need and divine remedy: trespasses are addressed through Jesus being “delivered up,” and justification is tied to Jesus being raised (v. 25). The resurrection is not an optional add-on; it is part of how Paul explains justification within his argument (see Romans 3:21–26).
Support This Project
We're building free, high-quality tools to help anyone study the Bible deeply in its original context. Partner with us.
Explore Related Content
Related Links
Bible & Context
Join our newsletter for updates on new features and what's going on with the project.
- Context-first reading insights
- Bible & Context Updates
- Daily Devotional (Coming Soon)
Need help instead? Contact us.