Shared ground
Zechariah 7:4–7 presents God’s answer to a question about continuing set fasts, but the answer starts by reframing the issue. Instead of approving or rejecting the practice outright, God questions what the rituals have been for and toward (v.5). The text’s repeated “to me, even to me?” makes motive and audience the center of attention.
The passage also ties present questions to past revelation. God points back to what he “cried” through earlier prophets when Jerusalem and its surrounding regions were still secure and inhabited (v.7). That backward look implies continuity: the community’s current worship questions should be evaluated in light of earlier prophetic preaching, not only present feelings or customs.
Where interpretation differs
Some readers take these questions as a broad critique of ritual fasting itself, as if God is rejecting the practice as such. Others see the target as misdirected ritual—fasting done in a self-focused way, without genuine regard for God.
A smaller question is how tightly v.7 connects to the topic of fasting. Some understand v.7 to mean the former prophets addressed the same mismatch between ritual and obedience; others read it more generally as “remember the earlier prophetic message that warned you before disaster,” with fasting only being the immediate trigger for the conversation.
Why the disagreement exists
The passage is made almost entirely of pointed questions (vv.5–7) rather than explicit conclusions. Questions can expose a problem (self-centered worship) without stating whether the practice (fasting) should continue in some corrected form. Also, v.7 names “the former prophets” and a time of prosperity, but it does not quote what those prophets said here, leaving room to debate the precise connection.
What this passage clearly contributes
Explicitly, the text claims: (1) the message is God’s word to Zechariah (v.4); (2) it addresses both “all the people of the land” and “the priests” (v.5); (3) the fasts in the fifth and seventh months persisted for “seventy years” (v.5); (4) God challenges whether those fasts were truly “to me” (v.5); (5) he compares this with ordinary eating and drinking being “for yourselves” (v.6); and (6) he summons attention to earlier prophetic warning given in a time of stability (v.7). Theological inference that follows from these claims is that God evaluates worship by its real orientation, and that present religious questions should be tested against God’s prior, publicly delivered word (Zechariah 7:4–7).