Shared ground
Deuteronomy 29:1 functions as a heading: what follows is presented as “the words of the covenant.” The verse also stresses an authority chain—Yahweh commands, Moses establishes, Israel receives. That frames the material not as private reflection or general moral advice, but as binding covenant speech for the whole people.
The setting matters. Israel is located “in the land of Moab,” at a transition point before entering the land. The verse also looks backward to “Horeb,” recalling the earlier covenant that shaped Israel’s identity.
Where interpretation differs
The main question is how to understand “besides the covenant … at Horeb.” Some read this as a distinct covenant act in Moab that adds something new alongside Horeb. Others read it as a renewal or restatement of the Horeb covenant for a new generation and new situation, even if it includes additional instructions.
A smaller question is scope: whether “the words of the covenant” mainly points forward to the warnings and commitments of chapters 29–30, or whether it gathers up the covenant material just given (and then transitions into renewal language). Both readings treat the verse as a structural marker.
Why the disagreement exists
The verse uses brief, heading-like language. The word “besides” can naturally be heard as “in addition to,” but it can also function in context as “along with,” introducing a renewed covenant moment without implying a completely separate covenant system. Also, Deuteronomy itself often restates earlier commands while applying them to a new setting, which can sound either like “renewal” or like “new covenant-making,” depending on emphasis.
What this passage clearly contributes
Explicitly, the text identifies a covenant event in Moab that Yahweh commanded Moses to establish with Israel, and it places that event alongside an earlier covenant made at Horeb (Deuteronomy 29:1). Theologically (by inference), it highlights continuity and accountability across generations: Israel’s relationship with Yahweh is anchored in a remembered past (Horeb) while being formally re-addressed at a new moment (Moab). It also shows covenant as something conveyed through words—public speech that defines the relationship and its obligations.