Preparing Context
Loading the book, timeline, map, and study notes.
Book
World Stage
Structure
Historical Setting
Opening Book
Loading the overview, historical setting, map, timeline, and chapter structure.
Book
World Stage
Structure
Historical Setting
Opening Chapter
Loading the chapter, structure, timeline, and Scripture reader.
Book
World Stage
Structure
Historical Setting
Opening Passage
Loading the passage, surrounding structure, questions, and study notes.
Book
World Stage
Structure
Historical Setting
Jeremiah 20:3-6
After release, Jeremiah delivers a direct word to Pashhur, renaming him and unfolding a stepped forecast of defeat, plunder, and exile.
Meaning in context
After release, Jeremiah delivers a direct word to Pashhur, renaming him and unfolding a stepped forecast of defeat, plunder, and exile.
Section 2 of 6
A renamed priest and a Babylon warning
After release, Jeremiah delivers a direct word to Pashhur, renaming him and unfolding a stepped forecast of defeat, plunder, and exile.
Movement
Warning before Jerusalem falls
Artifact
Prophetic lament and new covenant promise
Biblical Timeline
Kingdom
Jeremiah context: 1000 BC - 586 BC
Biblical Timeline
Kingdom
Jeremiah context
Kingdom / 1000 BC - 586 BC
Jeremiah context is set in the kingdom period, where Israel's monarchy from David and Solomon to exile.
Scripture Text
Thesis
After release, Jeremiah delivers a direct word to Pashhur, renaming him and unfolding a stepped forecast of defeat, plunder, and exile.
Verse by Verse
Release, confrontation, and a new name Jeremiah is brought out of confinement “the next day.” He immediately tells Pashhur that Yahweh is changing how he is to be known: not “Pashhur,” but “Magor-missabib.” The renaming frames what follows as more than an insult; it is presented as Yahweh’s verdict on Pashhur’s future identity.
Terror, deaths, and Judah handed to Babylon Jeremiah explains the name by announcing that Yahweh will make Pashhur a source of fear, even to himself, and a warning to his friends. Those friends will fall in battle, and Pashhur will have to watch it happen. The oracle then widens: all Judah will be delivered into the hand of the king of Babylon, who will deport people to Babylon and also kill by the sword.
Economic collapse and the loss of royal treasures The message adds that the city’s wealth will not be protected: riches, productive gains, and precious items will be handed over to enemies. Even the stored treasures associated with Judah’s kings will become plunder. The repeated movement is from “I will give” to “they will take,” stressing both divine initiative and enemy action, ending again with the destination “to Babylon.”
Literary Context
This scene belongs to a stretch in Jeremiah where the prophet faces sharp opposition and humiliation from people with religious authority, and his messages of coming disaster collide with official confidence and competing claims to speak for God. The episode follows immediately on Jeremiah’s earlier warning at the temple and the punishment he receives for it, so the “next day” functions like a continuation of the same conflict. Jeremiah’s response moves from a direct address to Pashhur, to a wider oracle about Judah, and back to Pashhur, making Pashhur’s personal downfall a signpost for the broader national crisis Jeremiah 19:14–20:2.
Historical Context
Jeremiah speaks in Judah’s last decades, when international pressure from Babylon is growing and Judah’s leaders are torn between resistance, alliances, and attempts at religious stability. Temple officials and priests hold public influence and can discipline disruptive voices, including prophets. The text assumes that deportation to Babylon is a real political threat and that war will decide leadership and security. It also reflects a setting where multiple prophetic messages circulate, some reassuring and some alarming, and where Jeremiah’s warnings are treated as dangerous or disloyal by those responsible for public order.
Theological Significance
Questions
Keep Studying
Pashhur’s exile, death, and the charge of false prophecy Jeremiah returns directly to Pashhur: he and his household will go into captivity, arrive in Babylon, die there, and be buried there. The final line explains why Pashhur’s social network is included: Jeremiah accuses him of prophesying falsely to his friends, tying Pashhur’s influence to the coming disaster.
Jeremiah 20:3–6 presents a public word of judgment spoken immediately after Jeremiah is released from restraint. The core move is a God-given renaming: Pashhur will not be “Pashhur” but “Magor-missabib,” a name that signals fear closing in. The passage then connects Pashhur’s future with the wider national crisis: Judah will be handed over to Babylon’s king, people will be deported, and many will die by violence.
The text also links religious authority and public accountability. Pashhur is a temple official who punished Jeremiah, but Jeremiah portrays that action as opposition to God’s message. The closing line (“to whom you have prophesied falsely”) frames Pashhur’s influence over “friends” as part of the problem.
Some readers treat “Magor-missabib” as a formal, lasting renaming from God, almost like an official new identity. Others take it as a prophetic nickname—still authoritative and meaningful, but mainly rhetorical: Pashhur becomes a living label for the terror that is coming.
There is also some range in how strictly “all Judah” is heard. Some take it as a comprehensive statement about the nation’s fate (deportation and death as the defining outcome). Others hear it as a broad, general verdict: the country as a whole will fall under Babylonian control, even if individuals’ experiences differ.
Finally, “friends” can be read narrowly (Pashhur’s supporters and fellow officials) or more broadly (his social network and those who listened to him).
The passage uses compressed prophetic speech: a name is given, then the name is explained by a chain of outcomes (terror, deaths, national defeat, exile, plunder). That style leaves open questions about scope (“all Judah”), social reference (“friends”), and how literally to take symbolic acts (renaming).
Explicitly, the text claims God is the one “giving” Judah and Jerusalem’s wealth into enemy hands, while Babylon is the agent that carries out deportation, killing, and plunder. It also presents Babylon not as a vague threat but as the concrete destination repeated throughout the oracle. Inference-wise (but strongly suggested by the ending), the passage treats misleading public religious speech as consequential: it can bind people into false confidence just as danger is closing in. The renaming makes Pashhur’s personal downfall function as a sign of the broader collapse Jeremiah has been warning about (compare Jeremiah 19:14–20:2).
give (’et·tên)