Preparing Context
Loading the book, timeline, map, and study notes.
Book
World Stage
Structure
Historical Setting
Opening Book
Loading the overview, historical setting, map, timeline, and chapter structure.
Book
World Stage
Structure
Historical Setting
Opening Chapter
Loading the chapter, structure, timeline, and Scripture reader.
Book
World Stage
Structure
Historical Setting
Opening Passage
Loading the passage, surrounding structure, questions, and study notes.
Book
World Stage
Structure
Historical Setting
Jeremiah 24:9-10
The closing lines list escalating consequences, from being driven among kingdoms to calamities that end their hold on the land.
Meaning in context
The closing lines list escalating consequences, from being driven among kingdoms to calamities that end their hold on the land.
Section 6 of 6
Scattering and ruin announced for the bad figs
The closing lines list escalating consequences, from being driven among kingdoms to calamities that end their hold on the land.
Movement
Warning before Jerusalem falls
Artifact
Prophetic lament and new covenant promise
Biblical Timeline
Kingdom
Jeremiah context: 1000 BC - 586 BC
Biblical Timeline
Kingdom
Jeremiah context
Kingdom / 1000 BC - 586 BC
Jeremiah context is set in the kingdom period, where Israel's monarchy from David and Solomon to exile.
Scripture Text
Thesis
The closing lines list escalating consequences, from being driven among kingdoms to calamities that end their hold on the land.
Verse by Verse
Continuing disasters until removal from the land God adds three recurring forms of catastrophe—“the sword, the famine, and the pestilence” (pestilence). These are sent “among them” and continue “until” they are consumed and no longer remain on “the land” that had been given to them and to their “fathers.” The end result is loss of the ancestral homeland.
Literary Context
These verses complete the interpretation of the “bad figs” in Jeremiah 24, where two baskets of figs symbolize two groups connected to Judah’s crisis. The larger unit contrasts good figs (treated as a group God will preserve and eventually restore) with bad figs (treated as a group headed toward disaster). Verses 9–10 press the “bad figs” outcome to its full extent: first public disgrace and scattering, then ongoing calamities that end in removal from the land. The language also echoes covenant-warning style found elsewhere in the Bible (for example Deuteronomy 28:25).
Historical Context
Jeremiah speaks during Judah’s final decades as Babylon rises to dominance. After Babylon’s earlier deportation of some Judeans (including elites), different groups remained in Judah and also lived under shifting political pressures. Jeremiah 24 addresses how to interpret these upheavals: deportation, continued life in Jerusalem, and the fate of leaders and people under foreign power. In this setting, talk of being “driven” into many kingdoms and suffering “sword, famine, and pestilence” fits a wartime world of sieges, forced movement, and public shame as nations are conquered and populations destabilized.
Theological Significance
Questions
Keep Studying
Jeremiah 24:9–10 continues the “bad figs” interpretation by describing a coming judgment. The text explicitly portrays forced scattering (“tossed back and forth”) across many kingdoms, not as ordinary resettlement but as harm. Along with displacement, it describes public disgrace: their situation becomes a byword people repeat—“reproach,” “proverb,” “taunt,” and “curse”—wherever they are driven.
The passage also explicitly links this outcome to ongoing disasters: “sword,” “famine,” and “pestilence” (pestilence). These troubles persist “until” they are “consumed” from the land given to them and their ancestors. The language echoes covenant-warning phrasing elsewhere (compare Deuteronomy 28:25), framing the exile and its shame as the fulfillment of earlier warnings.
Some disagreement centers on the scope of “all the kingdoms of the earth.” One reading takes it as broad, near-literal worldwide dispersion; another treats it as a strong way of saying “everywhere we end up,” meaning wide and humiliating scattering within the known political world.
A second difference is what “consumed” most directly means. Some read it as total death (the people die out through war, starvation, and disease). Others read it as total removal from the land (the community is eliminated from the land as their home, whether by death, deportation, or both).
A third difference concerns where the “sword, famine, and pestilence” strike. Some think the sequence mainly describes what happens in Judah leading up to removal; others include the idea that these disasters can continue among them in places of displacement.
Why the disagreement exists The wording compresses several realities into a few lines: scattered “among kingdoms,” shamed “in all places,” and afflicted “until” they are “consumed from off the land.” Those phrases can be read either as rhetorical emphasis or as strict geographic totals, and “until…consumed” can describe a result (no longer in the land) without specifying the exact mechanism (death versus deportation versus both).
What this passage clearly contributes This text presents judgment as (1) destabilizing displacement, (2) reputational collapse in the eyes of other peoples, and (3) recurring calamities that do not stop until the people are no longer on the promised land. It also makes a strong claim about agency: God “gives them up,” “drives them,” and “sends” these disasters. The passage therefore links national catastrophe and exile to divine judgment within the book’s covenant framework, rather than treating them as random geopolitical accidents.
land (hā·’ă·ḏā·māh)