Shared ground
Matthew presents these events as guided movement: danger eases when Herod dies, and Joseph receives direction through dreams (vv. 19–20, 22). The text explicitly says the return is possible because “those who sought the child’s life are dead” (v. 20). Joseph’s actions are described as prompt obedience: he takes the child and his mother and re-enters “the land of Israel” (v. 21).
Matthew also frames geography as meaningful. Joseph intends to settle in Judea but changes course after hearing Archelaus rules there and after another dream warning (v. 22). The result is a move to Galilee and residence in Nazareth (vv. 22–23a). Matthew then adds a Scripture connection: living in Nazareth corresponds to what “the prophets” said, summarized as “He will be called a Nazarene” (v. 23b; Matthew 2:19–23).
Where interpretation differs (only where needed)
One main question is what Matthew means by “He will be called a Nazarene” (v. 23). Some think Matthew is pointing to a specific Old Testament line that is being echoed in a compressed way, even if it is not quoted word-for-word. Others think Matthew is summarizing a broader prophetic theme rather than citing a single verse, which fits his wording “spoken through the prophets” (plural).
A smaller question is who exactly “those” are who sought the child’s life (v. 20). Some read it as Herod and his close agents; others read it more broadly as anyone aligned with that threat. The text itself does not list names beyond Herod and then shifts quickly to Archelaus.
Why the disagreement exists
Matthew does not name the prophet or provide a direct quotation source, and the phrasing “He will be called a Nazarene” is not an obvious one-to-one match to a single, well-known Old Testament sentence. Also, Matthew’s plural “prophets” can sound like either “multiple texts” or “a general prophetic message.”
What this passage clearly contributes
This scene completes a pattern in Matthew’s opening chapters: political threat, divine warning, relocation, and a closing statement that connects Jesus’ life setting to Scripture. Explicitly, it explains why Jesus grows up in Nazareth (not Judea) and highlights Joseph’s protective decision-making shaped by both public news (Archelaus reigning) and dream warnings. Theologically inferred from Matthew’s framing (not stated as a direct claim) is that Jesus’ early life is presented as both historically situated (real rulers, real regions) and coordinated with God’s purposes as Matthew understands them.