Shared ground
The passage assumes a real social setting where some Christians are enslaved and answer to “their own masters.” The immediate focus is ordinary, observable conduct: cooperative service, a non-combative posture in speech, honesty with a master’s property, and a reputation for reliability (vv. 9–10).
An explicit purpose is given: this kind of behavior “adorns” (makes attractive or fitting) “the teaching of God our Savior” in “all things” (v. 10). The link between teaching and conduct matches the letter’s wider concern that people can claim to know God while their actions undermine that claim (Titus 1:16).
Where interpretation differs
One question is how far “in all things” reaches. Some read it as comprehensive cooperation within the sphere of legitimate duties, without implying agreement with wrongdoing. Others think the wording, in its original context, leans toward outward compliance as the safest public stance, even when a master’s character is poor—while still not requiring participation in explicit evil.
Another question is what counts as “not contradicting.” Some take it mainly as avoiding disrespectful arguing or defiance. Others include any pattern of verbal resistance that harms the household’s public reputation, even if the servant’s points are reasonable.
A third question is how broad “not stealing” is. Some limit it to property theft. Others understand it more widely as any breach of trust: pilfering, skimming, misusing access, or other dishonesty that would be common in household labor.
Why the disagreement exists
The passage gives short instructions without examples. The repeated phrase “in all things” (vv. 9–10) can sound absolute, yet the text does not spell out edge cases (immoral commands, protest, self-protection). Also, “contradicting” can describe anything from rude backtalk to firm objection, and the text does not define tone, setting, or limits.
What this passage clearly contributes
Explicitly, Titus is to urge servants toward submission to their masters, a consistently helpful aim (“well-pleasing”), non-oppositional speech, and proven honesty and trustworthiness (vv. 9–10). The passage also explicitly frames these behaviors as public witness: they make the Christian message about God the Savior look attractive and credible across the full range of daily life (“in all things,” v. 10). That purpose statement ties ethics to the reputation of Christian teaching in the eyes of observers.