Shared ground
These verses close the Uriah episode by narrating three outwardly ordinary events—mourning, remarriage, and childbirth—followed by an extraordinary divine evaluation. Bathsheba is still identified as “Uriah’s wife” when she hears the news, and her lament is presented as a real response to a real death. After the mourning period ends, David initiates the next steps by royal action: he sends, takes, and brings her into his house, and she becomes his wife. A son is born.
The final sentence re-frames the whole report. The narrator states that “what David had done” displeased Yahweh. The text’s last word is not political success or public respectability, but God’s verdict.
Where interpretation differs
Two main questions are left open by the wording.
First, what exactly is included in “what David had done”? Some read it as pointing especially to the marriage-and-cover-up that follows Uriah’s death; others take it as a summary of the whole chain of actions in the larger story (adultery, manipulation, and the arranged death), now being judged in one closing line.
Second, how should David’s initiative be understood? The verbs (“sent,” “took,” “brought”) clearly highlight David’s control, but the text does not describe Bathsheba’s level of choice in this moment. Some readers infer coercion because of the power imbalance; others think the author is mainly emphasizing David’s management of events without specifying her agency.
Why the disagreement exists
The passage is brief and compressed. It reports the sequence of events but does not give internal thoughts, the length of mourning, or public reaction. Because it is a summary ending, it invites readers to connect it back to the larger narrative and decide how wide the narrator’s moral spotlight is.
What this passage clearly contributes
The passage shows how quickly a king can move people and change social status, and how easily outwardly “proper” steps (mourning observed, marriage formalized, child born) can sit alongside serious wrongdoing. It also anchors moral evaluation in Yahweh’s perspective rather than in what can be managed publicly. The final verdict sets the stage for the prophetic confrontation in 2 Samuel 12:1.