Shared ground
This passage presents a structured way Israel’s covenant teaching is preserved and transmitted. Moses writes “this law” and hands it over to recognized leaders (priests associated with the ark and the elders). That transfer signals continuity beyond Moses’ lifetime (explicit in v. 9).
It also assumes the covenant instruction is not meant to be private property of experts. It is to be heard publicly on a set rhythm—at the end of each seven-year cycle, tied to the “year of release” and the Festival of Booths—when Israel gathers at the place Yahweh chooses (explicit in vv. 10–11).
The audience is deliberately broad: men, women, small children, and the resident outsider living “within your gates” are assembled so they can hear, learn, develop reverent loyalty toward Yahweh, and keep the law’s words (explicit in vv. 12–13). The text connects public hearing with generational continuity in the land.
Where interpretation differs
What “this law” includes. Some read “this law” as the book of Deuteronomy (especially its covenant instruction). Others think it refers to a larger body of Moses’ teaching (possibly extending beyond Deuteronomy). The passage itself states Moses wrote “this law” but does not list its boundaries.
Who exactly must read it aloud. The command is given to the custodians Moses hands the law to (priests and elders), but the “you shall read” in v. 11 can be understood as: (1) the priests specifically, (2) the elders as civil leadership, or (3) whoever they appoint to do the public reading under their authority.
How “appear before Yahweh” works for distant communities. Some take the language as implying a practical expectation that the whole nation gathers periodically at the central worship site. Others see it as covenant language expressing united worship at the chosen place, without claiming every individual can always travel.
Why the disagreement exists
The passage is specific about the schedule, setting, and purpose of the reading, but it is less specific about the scope of “this law,” the precise reader, and how the ideal of “all Israel” maps onto everyday logistics. Those gaps leave room for more than one reasonable reconstruction.
What this passage clearly contributes
It ties God’s covenant instruction to (1) a written text, (2) authorized custody (priests and elders), (3) regular public proclamation, and (4) inclusive access, extending even to resident outsiders. The passage also makes an explicit link between hearing the law and maintaining covenant loyalty across generations “as long as you live in the land” (vv. 12–13). It shows that Israel’s communal life is meant to be continually re-formed by a publicly heard standard, not by changing preferences or mere memory.