Shared ground
The passage presents a clear “then vs. now” change: people who were “far off” are now “near,” and the stated means is “the blood of Christ” (v.13). The text’s focus is not only personal closeness to God but the ending of a real separation between “both” groups (vv.14–16). Christ is not merely a peacemaker; he is called “our peace,” and his work results in “one” shared reality: one people, one body, one access (vv.14, 16, 18; see also ).
The main explicit claims are that Christ breaks down a dividing barrier, ends hostility connected to “commandments…in ordinances,” creates “one new man” from the two, reconciles both to God through the cross, and gives both shared access to the Father “in one Spirit” (vv.14–18). The passage ties human unity and reconciliation with God together rather than treating them as unrelated topics.
Where interpretation differs
1) What is the “middle wall” (v.14)? Some think Paul is mainly drawing on temple imagery—especially a remembered barrier that marked Gentile limits—so the picture highlights restricted approach and exclusion. Others read it more generally as any social boundary that kept Jews and Gentiles apart (customs, status, separations in daily life), with “wall” as a vivid metaphor.
2) What is “the law of commandments…in ordinances” that is abolished (v.15)? Some take this as God’s law as a covenant boundary-marker between Jews and Gentiles, especially its regulations that separated communities (food, calendar, purity). Others argue Paul is speaking of the law’s role in producing hostility, so what ends is its divisive, condemning function (and the rule-system as a barrier), not the idea that God’s moral will disappears.
3) What does “one new man” mean (v.15)? Some hear “new humanity” language: Christ creates a new kind of human community that transcends old categories. Others emphasize “one new people”: a single reconciled community made from Jews and Gentiles, without erasing their histories but removing the boundary that defined who could belong.
Why the disagreement exists
Paul stacks several images quickly—blood, wall, hostility, commandments/ordinances, new humanity, one body, access in one Spirit. Because these images can point in more than one direction, interpreters weigh different background connections (temple boundaries, social practice, covenant identity) and decide what “abolished” must mean in that setting.
What this passage clearly contributes
This text directly links Christ’s death (“blood,” “cross”) to both vertical reconciliation (“to God”) and horizontal peace (the end of hostility between groups). It portrays unity as something Christ creates, not something the groups negotiate. It also describes shared access to the Father as Trinitarian in shape: “through him…in one Spirit…to the Father” (v.18).