Shared ground
Joshua treats the remaining land as a settled gift from Yahweh and a remaining task for Israel. The text puts both ideas side by side: God “has given” the land, yet the people are “slack” to go in and take possession (v.3).
Joshua’s solution is practical and public. A representative group is sent to walk the land and produce a written description tied to inheritance allotments (v.4). Then Joshua uses lots “before Yahweh our God” to finalize who receives which portion (v.6).
The passage also clarifies that not every group receives the same kind of inheritance: Levites do not receive a land portion because their “inheritance” is priestly service, and some tribes already received land east of the Jordan (v.7).
Where interpretation differs
One question is scope: when Joshua says “three men of each tribe” (v.4), does he mean all twelve tribes, or only the seven tribes still waiting for an allotment in the west (vv.5–7)? Some read it as a general instruction stated broadly, but aimed at the remaining tribes. Others think it includes all tribes as a shared national process, even if some tribes already had their territories.
Another question is what the written “description” involved. Some take it mainly as boundary-and-town listing so lots can be applied to mapped regions. Others think it implies a fuller assessment of what each region can support (towns, farmland, access), so the “seven portions” are not only geometric but meant to be workable inheritances.
A third question is how to describe the relationship between human decision-making and divine decision-making. The text shows human surveying and dividing, and then lots cast “before Yahweh” (v.6). Some conclude the lot outcome is presented as Yahweh’s settled choice. Others emphasize that the lot is a sacred way to decide fairly after substantial human planning.
Why the disagreement exists
The passage is brief on logistics. It does not spell out exactly who is included in the survey team, what details the description contains, or how the seven portions were sized. It also uses “before Yahweh” language without explaining how directly God’s will is understood to be expressed through the lot.
What this passage clearly contributes
This unit connects promise, responsibility, and procedure: Yahweh’s gift of land (v.3), Israel’s delayed follow-through (v.3), and a structured process to complete inheritance distribution (vv.4–6). It also reinforces two special cases in Israel’s life: the Levites’ non-land “inheritance” tied to priesthood (v.7), and the earlier east-of-Jordan grants under Moses (v.7). The text presents lot-casting in Yahweh’s presence as the final, legitimizing step after careful on-the-ground description (v.6; compare Joshua 18:10).