Shared ground
Judges 2:6–7 looks back to the end of Joshua’s leadership to set a baseline for what comes next in Judges. The text presents a moment of transition: Joshua dismisses the gathered people, and they disperse to their assigned land portions in order to “possess” them (explicit claim). It also reports a period of covenant loyalty: Israel “served Yahweh” during Joshua’s lifetime, and that pattern continues during the lifetime of certain elders who outlived Joshua (explicit claim). Those elders are described as people who personally witnessed Yahweh’s “great work” done for Israel (explicit claim).
Where interpretation differs
How complete the faithfulness was. Some read “served Yahweh all the days” as a broad description of the era while allowing for real failures and inconsistencies within it. Others take it as a stronger statement: that, in general, Israel stayed loyal at the national level during those leadership years, with serious breakdown coming after the eyewitness generation died.
What “possess the land” means. Some interpret it mainly as moving into already-assigned territories and beginning settlement. Others hear a fuller sense: the ongoing work of securing and consolidating control over the land portion each group had received.
What counts as the “great work.” Some think the phrase points especially to conquest-era victories in the land. Others take it more broadly as Yahweh’s major acts for Israel, including earlier deliverance and wilderness guidance, now remembered and embodied by living witnesses.
Why the disagreement exists
The passage uses summary language (“all the days,” “great work”) without listing events or measuring exceptions. It also compresses time: Joshua’s dismissal, settlement in inheritances, and the extended influence of elders are reported in a few lines. Because the author is setting a contrast for later unfaithfulness, readers debate how absolute the positive assessment is and how directly eyewitness memory is presented as the reason faithfulness held.
What this passage clearly contributes
The text links Israel’s early steadiness to leadership continuity and living memory of Yahweh’s decisive acts (explicit claim that the elders had seen Yahweh’s great work). It frames the story of Judges by showing that instability is not presented as immediate or inevitable; there was an earlier period characterized as serving Yahweh under Joshua and the elders. It also highlights Israel’s decentralized life in the land: people return “each to his inheritance” to possess it, setting up the tribal-level setting in which the rest of Judges unfolds (explicit claim).