Shared ground
These verses close Psalm 36 by turning earlier praise into a request. The speaker asks God to keep extending loyal love (a committed, ongoing care) to “those who know” him, and to give “righteousness” to the “upright in heart” (explicit textual claims). Then the prayer narrows to personal danger: the speaker asks not to be trampled by “the foot of pride” or pushed out by “the hand of the wicked” (explicit textual claims).
The passage assumes a moral contrast already developed in the psalm: arrogant, harmful people threaten others, while God’s dependable goodness is a refuge. The prayer’s logic is that God’s steady goodness should continue and show up as real protection.
Where interpretation differs
Two phrases invite more than one reasonable reading.
-
“Those who know you”: Some read this mainly as covenant loyalty—people who align themselves with God and his ways. Others read it more as personal familiarity—people who genuinely recognize and relate to God.
-
“Your righteousness”: Some take this as God acting fairly and setting things right for his people (faithful help). Others take it as God fostering or recognizing right living in them (moral rightness). In practice, many interpreters see both ideas overlapping: God’s “rightness” is shown both in what he does and in the kind of people he supports.
Why the disagreement exists
The key terms are broad enough to cover connected ideas. “Know” can describe relational loyalty as well as personal recognition, and “righteousness” can refer to fair action and to rightness in character. Also, the images in v.11 (“foot,” “hand,” “drive me away”) are poetic and can point to different concrete threats: social removal, forced displacement, or decisive defeat.
What this passage clearly contributes
The text clearly links God’s ongoing loyal love with people described as knowing him and being upright inside (without spelling out all the mechanics). It also shows that prayer can move from general claims about God to specific requests for protection against arrogant and violent pressure. The threat is portrayed as oppressive power (“foot of pride” and “hand of the wicked”), and the desired outcome is continued stability and safety rather than being forced out.